{"id":"W1988884757","doi":"10.5558/tfc77479-3","title":"Revisiting traditional land use and occupancy studies: Relevance and implications for resource management in Alberta","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arctic Institute of North America","keywords":"Government (linguistics); General partnership; Context (archaeology); Resource (disambiguation); Relevance (law); Local government; Political science; Politics; Land management; Public relations; Environmental resource management; Land use; Public administration; Environmental planning; Business; Sociology; Geography; Economics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00936376,0.0002807495,0.0003937341,0.00312293,0.00655726,0.005024846,0.002796225,0.0006121283,0.001812415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01000968,0.0002982202,0.0002003341,0.008589176,0.009145658,0.002200505,0.005239483,0.001346981,0.00008335388],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03783681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05212879,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9368369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9826847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953858,0.001653352,0.0001607092,0.0002418454,0.001715445,0.0008428334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881328,0.007435808,0.0007951155,0.0004011535,0.002452877,0.0007822638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001278109,0.0001577108,0.2037385,0.001037342,0.00005910297,0.001767094,0.6563915,0.001305209,0.001443258,0.02358936,0.003732274,0.1066509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005413788,0.00005089945,0.1163504,0.0003271485,0.00002399612,0.00009695758,0.8612295,0.0004349421,0.0003940249,0.001617202,0.019442,0.00002751465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9636062,0.002769273,0.001229068,0.003734799,0.00007430528,0.0001038853,0.0001857877,0.00001544359,0.02828121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99268,0.002220077,0.001180419,0.0005468921,0.00002412449,0.0000360766,0.00008291975,0.000006615873,0.003222953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0631631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2745266,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04067738681812876,"score_gpt":0.2636230425379389,"score_spread":0.2229456557198101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}