{"id":"W1988884757","doi":"10.5558/tfc77479-3","title":"Revisiting traditional land use and occupancy studies: Relevance and implications for resource management in Alberta","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arctic Institute of North America","keywords":"Government (linguistics); General partnership; Context (archaeology); Resource (disambiguation); Relevance (law); Local government; Political science; Politics; Land management; Public relations; Environmental resource management; Land use; Public administration; Environmental planning; Business; Sociology; Geography; Economics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001365145,0.00008480623,0.0000911399,0.00003133715,0.0001207804,0.00003423602,0.00007235964,0.00002076287,0.000002402915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003042662,0.00006601552,0.00001598329,0.00008631271,0.00004942725,0.00005728222,0.00004478866,0.00006508342,0.00000128907],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004577636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002175543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002002941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004569166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994983,0.0000114021,0.0001317845,0.0001369411,0.00004367403,0.0001778881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994757,0.0003035706,0.00001996337,0.0001661144,0.000006975137,0.00002769858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000251743,0.0001791278,0.3660139,0.003706341,0.00131501,0.00004579778,0.01000202,0.1781853,0.0002851492,0.1702633,0.04159315,0.2281591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002203993,0.00007248434,0.674671,0.0005346033,0.000105143,0.0000588389,0.001444203,0.04939882,0.00002110322,0.004897191,0.266185,0.0004075491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911694,0.003789143,0.0004022048,0.001539901,0.00002204071,0.0003323185,0.000009239116,0.00004907522,0.002686667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970063,0.001730967,0.0004825786,0.00007809054,0.00009044327,0.00009917703,0.000008038145,0.00001583608,0.0004886009],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3086571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2692035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04067738681812876,"score_gpt":0.2636230425379389,"score_spread":0.2229456557198101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}