{"id":"W1988915043","doi":"10.1289/ehp.1307260","title":"A Framework for the Next Generation of Risk Science","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Health Perspectives","topic":"Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Office of the Secretary of Defense; Health Canada; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; University of Ottawa; California Environmental Protection Agency; Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry; National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Risk management; Risk assessment; Risk management framework; Context (archaeology); Risk analysis (engineering); Agency (philosophy); IT risk management; Business; Population; Computer science; Medicine; Environmental health; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008118869,0.0001118575,0.0001385591,0.00002124829,0.0006550806,0.00002221612,0.0002794531,0.00002719178,0.0002473111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004111943,0.00007464785,0.00007022893,0.0001180539,0.001072827,0.0001572165,0.0001270168,0.0001394478,0.00003454043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002629269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001152274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003239827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001691461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987674,0.00006663975,0.000191432,0.000355434,0.0003055112,0.0003135871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998796,0.0006113227,0.0001858217,0.0003048156,0.000002818975,0.00009920062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001934505,0.002217188,0.1008183,0.0001131477,0.00007268662,6.317727e-7,0.05965488,0.007911516,0.4650439,0.05368946,0.004855665,0.3054292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002346035,0.002626815,0.7022734,0.0001299724,0.0001027016,0.00001795099,0.03666309,0.09231869,0.1108545,0.0302598,0.02125593,0.001151094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832535,0.0007361673,0.01397785,0.001038517,0.0001241513,0.0004858111,0.00002420869,0.00001766264,0.0003420763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820239,0.0004847191,0.01706301,0.0001783261,0.0001627367,0.00003659237,0.000002957835,0.00001211705,0.00003563658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6014552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5038416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03314909935750965,"score_gpt":0.3767585190246149,"score_spread":0.3436094196671052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}