{"id":"W1989032252","doi":"10.1016/s0019-0578(07)60107-4","title":"Controller performance analysis with LQG benchmark obtained under closed loop conditions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISA Transactions","topic":"Fault Detection and Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Syncrude","keywords":"Linear-quadratic-Gaussian control; Optimal projection equations; Control theory (sociology); Setpoint; Benchmark (surveying); Controller (irrigation); Subspace topology; Optimal control; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Control (management); Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009180795,0.0008107453,0.0008417865,0.0009552954,0.0005496811,0.000989369,0.0004142178,0.001031732,0.002939233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004009124,0.0001763489,0.0003663368,0.0005190112,0.0003197854,0.0004457941,0.0003468753,0.0005045254,0.000386126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006353929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005405801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01421839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007641013,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993039,0.0001380175,0.00004458044,0.00008811846,0.0002291813,0.0001961829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975452,0.001218866,0.0001600562,0.0002036086,0.0008294088,0.00004287254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002861873,0.0003476354,0.002564421,0.001222968,0.0002453707,0.0003176055,0.0002341033,0.8839584,0.05183476,0.004394938,0.004522938,0.04749503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008724941,0.0006643851,0.008686485,0.00003307334,0.00005428444,0.00007352883,0.0001101175,0.9647468,0.02371991,0.001067222,0.0007149065,0.0000420848],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8065594,0.002627422,0.154001,0.0003958823,0.0002798333,0.0001489154,0.001887716,0.003564626,0.03053532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957854,0.00005908819,0.002926293,0.00002291261,0.000007040393,0.00001937179,0.0004966042,0.00004478325,0.0006385564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01421839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02827126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008034623126453238,"score_gpt":0.1880206737994975,"score_spread":0.1799860506730443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}