{"id":"W1989108037","doi":"10.1016/j.jmp.2005.11.004","title":"Modelling intransitive preferences: A random-effects approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Council","keywords":"Transitive relation; Pairwise comparison; Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Replication (statistics); Computer science; Econometrics; Invariant (physics); Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008773049,0.0009856533,0.002626977,0.001065107,0.0005166427,0.002261117,0.003764478,0.00250579,0.009706479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02671279,0.001513199,0.003272468,0.001203618,0.001322503,0.003803764,0.00146413,0.003829683,0.001107444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009062466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008084926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005135397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00619225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962811,0.002431186,0.0001209895,0.0006021401,0.0002344577,0.0003301484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9667643,0.02809403,0.001236064,0.002683947,0.000731075,0.0004905229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001212967,0.000884908,0.004751995,0.0002067777,0.0008833582,0.0005419349,0.0004513926,0.8027334,0.002089078,0.1659946,0.001233016,0.01901658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008057377,0.00006547254,0.000288041,0.000007010663,0.00008295461,0.00004040153,0.00001556881,0.9615237,0.000191856,0.03750589,0.000171508,0.00002693409],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1298327,0.0001558894,0.8662264,0.0004117618,0.00008100038,0.0001548266,0.0003301064,0.0002724297,0.002534802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8657472,0.0002871049,0.1248631,0.0002523629,0.0001182941,0.0003773052,0.0003102976,0.0001964074,0.007848074],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009706479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04639685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2219304081732033,"score_gpt":0.4461721564620321,"score_spread":0.2242417482888287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}