{"id":"W1989217705","doi":"10.1144/1467-7873/03-062","title":"The design and application of sequential extractions for mercury, Part 2. Resorption of mercury onto the sample during leaching","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geochemistry Exploration Environment Analysis","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Mercury (programming language); Leaching (pedology); Environmental chemistry; Chemistry; Metallurgy; Environmental science; Computer science; Materials science; Soil science; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006153967,0.0001172876,0.0001558409,0.00002727226,0.0005294755,0.00002162976,0.0001198211,0.00004518914,0.0001920835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007238027,0.0000775942,0.0001186776,0.000181509,0.0002537492,0.0002925874,0.00006093269,0.00006516404,0.000006298366],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009288813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004761241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009808613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009960264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988834,0.0000780112,0.0003919979,0.00022258,0.0002802625,0.000143746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990034,0.0002774436,0.0003560927,0.0003107043,0.00001209127,0.00004029948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009156218,0.0001200759,0.009443356,0.00002419311,0.0004758177,4.067984e-8,0.002183703,0.2509145,0.7176113,0.0001321626,0.0004747928,0.01852845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008281288,0.00007364293,0.02611315,0.00001857742,0.002427136,0.000002617521,0.004855774,0.1380896,0.7579564,0.001702628,0.0674483,0.0004840044],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3615116,0.0001914382,0.6354427,0.002063222,0.00001599168,0.0006059206,0.00003733895,0.0000147431,0.0001169699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956668,0.0006785365,0.002838991,0.00001352038,0.00005823164,0.000333108,0.00009476715,0.000007014517,0.0003090152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6341552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4072351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02623646590479436,"score_gpt":0.2614464194857479,"score_spread":0.2352099535809535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}