{"id":"W1989238586","doi":"10.2193/2008-136","title":"Utility of Expert‐Based Knowledge for Predicting Wildlife‐Vehicle Collisions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Expert opinion; Analytic hierarchy process; Expert elicitation; Consistency (knowledge bases); Computer science; Collision; Speed limit; Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Operations research; Ecology; Transport engineering; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007170456,0.0008677896,0.0007546663,0.004173529,0.0004127269,0.001780182,0.0009845063,0.001252263,0.001435078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03721968,0.0002990396,0.0009223612,0.001658691,0.0004992958,0.001567842,0.0009867464,0.0007016557,0.0002006251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001204161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001153413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01444894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0150027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954319,0.002418282,0.0003528092,0.0006928016,0.0008842807,0.0002199608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9536853,0.03851553,0.002745392,0.001120809,0.0033329,0.0006002265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000454145,0.0006336365,0.2210537,0.0002268738,0.000389894,0.0003125065,0.0005468084,0.7182855,0.0007213397,0.001129607,0.0006657876,0.0555802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002016131,0.0002165352,0.02394708,0.00007365857,0.00006980142,0.0000541925,0.0003306801,0.9720449,0.0005123696,0.002461751,0.0002353106,0.00003349029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9020846,0.0002421368,0.09156314,0.0002538233,0.00002705936,0.000201754,0.0006224507,0.000121477,0.004883622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934495,0.00003955518,0.006131415,0.0000188503,0.000005830857,0.00003177599,0.0001418647,0.000002885085,0.0001783874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01444894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03792143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02387037198138869,"score_gpt":0.2853273005640154,"score_spread":0.2614569285826267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}