{"id":"W1989339084","doi":"10.1108/03074800510575357","title":"Ethical perspectives of library and information science graduate students in the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical code; Professional ethics; Value (mathematics); Reading (process); Originality; Population; Information ethics; Information science; Prejudice (legal term); Graduate students; Medical education; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Library science; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Social psychology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001531373,0.0000683887,0.0001033546,0.000544504,0.00005043094,0.00008135377,0.0002365715,0.00003125138,0.00009971631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005641382,0.00004645461,0.00001792132,0.001514766,0.0002145276,0.005780752,0.0001324265,0.0003608658,0.000007777087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004909366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000125347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001324866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.82619e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991755,0.00006200145,0.0001839682,0.00009020529,0.0003628332,0.0001254667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995539,0.0001504736,0.00005313751,0.0001483452,0.00001078631,0.00008335552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008147712,0.000503245,0.7535755,0.0001418952,0.00003418406,0.00001182065,0.124752,0.00007683331,0.0001507547,0.0825694,0.0216647,0.01570486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001458614,0.0001910808,0.910318,0.0001673641,0.0000143667,0.000006278853,0.005201449,0.0005248743,0.002317176,0.002519689,0.07718563,0.00009545411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9423059,0.0001460605,0.000004178562,0.04324397,0.0000177594,0.0001968607,0.000005176502,0.00003692561,0.01404322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877617,0.000461501,0.0008410006,0.01037953,0.00005001513,0.000002223475,0.00005994367,0.000004646467,0.0004394943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1567425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4190906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04210879178433129,"score_gpt":0.3180402010609664,"score_spread":0.2759314092766351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}