{"id":"W1989343003","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2010.12.002","title":"SHIPP methodology: Predictive accident modeling approach. Part II. Validation with case study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fault tree analysis; Accident (philosophy); Hazard; Hazard analysis; Computer science; Event tree; Process (computing); Engineering; Reliability engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001699112,0.0007088394,0.000558952,0.0009585232,0.0003691968,0.0006341696,0.002131385,0.0006156887,0.004508459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003582532,0.0004391581,0.0008437567,0.0008574222,0.0002379711,0.0006263491,0.0007505388,0.0007051324,0.0007718998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007419339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001672348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01323188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009154368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993426,0.0003038392,0.00004423898,0.00006547082,0.0002076585,0.00003620538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985052,0.0007979916,0.00009645813,0.0002438961,0.0003340367,0.00002253051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001367729,0.0002658268,0.003712648,0.0003332059,0.00009781962,0.0001220065,0.0001316299,0.8976024,0.002071491,0.005630167,0.002036048,0.08785986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002482867,0.0001002536,0.0009858274,0.00002136087,0.00002734685,0.00005206991,0.00003569809,0.9933791,0.002075776,0.00185767,0.001429982,0.00001017836],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2425036,0.0002810068,0.7336936,0.0002466357,0.00005639173,0.000896976,0.003318246,0.002898699,0.01610486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7012222,0.0004098425,0.2909107,0.00004365954,0.00001854559,0.001395107,0.002351066,0.0002806428,0.003368217],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01323188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02630973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1205932648785061,"score_gpt":0.3408118195824883,"score_spread":0.2202185547039822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}