{"id":"W1989564834","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2005.00311.x","title":"Optimal risk‐sharing under adverse selection and imperfect risk perception","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse selection; Imperfect; Economics; Incentive; Redistribution (election); Perception; Welfare; Microeconomics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Risk perception; Extension (predicate logic); Actuarial science; Computer science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004122901,0.000494119,0.00112755,0.000490838,0.0004893566,0.002426233,0.0007133812,0.001051964,0.003005843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00818393,0.0003771998,0.0004969467,0.0004850405,0.001688707,0.00215957,0.001570103,0.0009364309,0.0002775937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001782816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001511552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001328682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008544872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997453,0.001412665,0.00009057485,0.0002406275,0.0002959351,0.0005070733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964439,0.001654047,0.0007052363,0.0005745665,0.0002874385,0.000334752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003518776,0.0001413792,0.002424975,0.00009933003,0.0001073108,0.0001753569,0.0002141461,0.2444141,0.00339386,0.7278732,0.001654661,0.01914975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008386853,0.00009830693,0.001839343,0.0000321331,0.00003165272,0.0000907638,0.000137974,0.2274818,0.001026811,0.7676638,0.00148613,0.00002740945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6589018,0.0005984753,0.3022932,0.003221157,0.00007853882,0.00008200054,0.0002163845,0.00008859432,0.03451994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99394,0.0001159264,0.004262925,0.00007692366,0.0000186614,0.00002177744,0.00001522015,0.000006303851,0.001542393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004122901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02180421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06064729893139187,"score_gpt":0.174834517850511,"score_spread":0.1141872189191192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}