{"id":"W1989654555","doi":"10.1890/08-2064.1","title":"Are forested buffers an effective conservation strategy for riparian fauna? An assessment using meta‐analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Riparian zone; Riparian buffer; Abundance (ecology); Fauna; Ecology; Environmental science; Habitat; Relative species abundance; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0099163,0.001443393,0.005979859,0.005529926,0.0002926024,0.001690201,0.00187709,0.0009296963,0.002235505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01877584,0.0006797292,0.008977687,0.005624833,0.0003560579,0.001474623,0.0007221919,0.0007590342,0.0001818077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001313199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001827292,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00413986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009779475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962671,0.002169319,0.0006086762,0.0005061555,0.000364767,0.00008399488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863163,0.01082053,0.001560942,0.0004734615,0.0006191859,0.0002096683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00137749,0.00008980608,0.03347543,0.2192925,0.495349,0.000217105,0.0003260995,0.003671404,0.00105669,0.001268585,0.003148811,0.2407272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004895435,0.0007233584,0.04019378,0.02355253,0.9108507,0.0003830442,0.0003290917,0.003955085,0.0007625207,0.002184468,0.01648641,0.00008946815],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01615256,0.9784642,0.00312883,0.0004857311,0.0001126209,0.0001304628,0.0008183236,0.00007769819,0.0006295736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4449293,0.5380729,0.0142204,0.0004491895,0.0001432683,0.0005116161,0.001292436,0.00003759124,0.0003432281],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0099163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05244309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1493775826977507,"score_gpt":0.4152692959555405,"score_spread":0.2658917132577898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}