{"id":"W1989670101","doi":"10.3109/10408444.2010.543655","title":"Critical analysis of literature on low-dose synergy for use in screening chemical mixtures for risk assessment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Health and Environmental Sciences Institute; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Additive function; Prioritization; Risk assessment; Toxicology; Statistics; Exposure assessment; Econometrics; Biochemical engineering; Mathematics; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002440077,0.0008346099,0.005088564,0.0007488396,0.000129824,0.00004298702,0.0008408947,0.00212762,0.0016005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01230699,0.0007001122,0.001690432,0.001457936,0.001520419,0.0002448726,0.0004430336,0.001538515,0.00003969177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006368845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004846959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001679511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002925407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927086,0.001810904,0.002419316,0.001627462,0.0002032968,0.001230445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856615,0.01270592,0.0004665858,0.000838169,0.00002340362,0.0003043937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004763031,0.005685056,0.001864862,0.01610534,0.0007180917,0.0001359516,0.0001546855,0.0001263704,0.0002607695,0.02854016,0.002333208,0.9435992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001199724,0.001827992,0.001297066,0.009030194,0.006410902,0.00003437183,0.00001429175,0.001266811,0.0001085148,0.004917123,0.9725064,0.001386612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006454144,0.9883228,0.003994049,0.000120631,0.0005603989,0.004646834,0.0008464895,0.00002532722,0.0008380768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001162488,0.9633214,0.02958629,0.0008244538,0.00009433864,0.004505321,0.000330009,0.00007891276,0.00009674803],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9701732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07583631578261409,"score_gpt":0.4046602475393756,"score_spread":0.3288239317567616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}