{"id":"W1989670101","doi":"10.3109/10408444.2010.543655","title":"Critical analysis of literature on low-dose synergy for use in screening chemical mixtures for risk assessment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Health and Environmental Sciences Institute; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Additive function; Prioritization; Risk assessment; Toxicology; Statistics; Exposure assessment; Econometrics; Biochemical engineering; Mathematics; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03187744,0.001982289,0.004359012,0.02961372,0.0007658066,0.003724747,0.002188009,0.001914562,0.006500028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08927228,0.0008511778,0.005520668,0.01267757,0.001278173,0.003542672,0.002222523,0.001999724,0.001185324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004605297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01200723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002549024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005540653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9826628,0.006501941,0.00456256,0.0008254494,0.00516793,0.0002792205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8482642,0.105789,0.0148632,0.002509085,0.02771229,0.0008622363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006362122,0.00008912874,0.001214125,0.5249808,0.003944958,0.0008015868,0.0009760972,0.001144017,0.003416118,0.006316253,0.01311509,0.4433656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001537054,0.001039275,0.006766975,0.5796998,0.02346765,0.001279678,0.001197751,0.0007937113,0.005285071,0.0138776,0.3662614,0.0001774546],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002434045,0.9843178,0.004211324,0.002941248,0.0007053464,0.0009258253,0.0008747166,0.00007804525,0.003511767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02735127,0.9499691,0.01427399,0.003263089,0.0008942236,0.001755356,0.001244631,0.00006434914,0.001183943],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03187744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1685861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07583631578261409,"score_gpt":0.4046602475393756,"score_spread":0.3288239317567616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}