{"id":"W1989752986","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2923.37.s1.3.x","title":"The quality of a simulation examination using a high‐fidelity child manikin","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Education","topic":"Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Children's Hospital; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Construct validity; Test (biology); Face validity; Competence (human resources); Fidelity; Concordance; Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Inter-rater reliability; Rating scale; Medical physics; Computer science; Applied psychology; Medicine; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01158795,0.0005870725,0.0005021907,0.0007351342,0.000252611,0.0009672923,0.0007286477,0.0006731261,0.001165659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04837877,0.0003182091,0.0006605148,0.0003207172,0.0008151057,0.0009422546,0.001444982,0.0004725079,0.0003361497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000645103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001539345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007701941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001120101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9882588,0.008216653,0.001240335,0.0003277872,0.00173612,0.0002202561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732485,0.01358507,0.005916932,0.001799654,0.004385407,0.001064406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001944203,0.0009162019,0.7298036,0.002524063,0.0003753523,0.0008333286,0.003085667,0.01318197,0.04296396,0.0006653227,0.0009751113,0.2027312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000225363,0.01498307,0.8838105,0.001406355,0.0003132313,0.009228827,0.002259966,0.03052359,0.0484895,0.0005691965,0.007963805,0.0002265432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9440994,0.001128401,0.05081008,0.0003412549,0.00006185497,0.0008566328,0.0001034857,0.0001604284,0.002438561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9400862,0.000539451,0.05861294,0.0000723363,0.00002685179,0.0002685163,0.000101287,0.00001438932,0.0002779468],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01158795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06128365,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06097028917892374,"score_gpt":0.4577048162389613,"score_spread":0.3967345270600376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}