{"id":"W1989752986","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2923.37.s1.3.x","title":"The quality of a simulation examination using a high‐fidelity child manikin","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Education","topic":"Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Children's Hospital; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Construct validity; Test (biology); Face validity; Competence (human resources); Fidelity; Concordance; Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Inter-rater reliability; Rating scale; Medical physics; Computer science; Applied psychology; Medicine; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00291977,0.0001209288,0.0002180228,0.0001214521,0.0002831069,0.00001665397,0.00009261921,0.0001781272,0.0004832172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009445003,0.00009615396,0.00006875804,0.0004835761,0.0001367274,0.0001003396,0.00001005906,0.0002576266,0.00001110337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004071541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00301859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007660088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003563723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970395,0.0006504876,0.000858467,0.0002513962,0.001000487,0.0001996635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966929,0.001141232,0.0004040137,0.000492338,0.001076211,0.0001933269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000400575,0.0043169,0.6631821,0.001808492,0.0001508676,0.000001441092,0.009248273,0.01071339,0.0006254783,0.1061758,0.001818309,0.2015583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008885548,0.00007446679,0.9642263,0.0002983447,0.00005639468,0.00001432839,0.00239496,0.02600252,0.0005392044,0.001785724,0.003576376,0.0001428354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839234,0.0003920773,0.007030721,0.005498768,0.001338699,0.0006756819,0.00000243012,0.00004120672,0.001096962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968656,0.00001860582,0.001065584,0.001468637,0.000311823,0.00004552617,0.00008448387,0.00001744056,0.0001223218],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3010441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06097028917892374,"score_gpt":0.4577048162389613,"score_spread":0.3967345270600376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}