{"id":"W1989763926","doi":"10.1108/02683940610690169","title":"Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Managerial Psychology","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5413,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Employee engagement; Psychology; Job satisfaction; Work engagement; Organizational citizenship behavior; Social psychology; Job design; Originality; Organizational commitment; Job attitude; Organizational justice; Job performance; Social exchange theory; Contextual performance; Variety (cybernetics); Public relations; Work (physics); Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00229224,0.0002474689,0.0002851771,0.00109075,0.001172364,0.00160623,0.0003395872,0.0006448022,0.005607706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01449841,0.000196323,0.0003708001,0.0006798976,0.001579763,0.0007054782,0.00231496,0.001291612,0.0002591953],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006910622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001208128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001739251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002185234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997184,0.001208173,0.0002063757,0.000217483,0.0005543543,0.0006296262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760717,0.01122746,0.006187247,0.001118115,0.001429507,0.003965847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008639491,0.0006757654,0.9829795,0.00005198083,0.00004443515,0.0002903417,0.001312454,0.0004612611,0.00035852,0.002280345,0.0002431118,0.01121598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001056961,0.0002052034,0.9900889,0.00005623496,0.0000245643,0.000203054,0.003951495,0.00103307,0.000192006,0.003576852,0.0006461182,0.00001200301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922842,0.000264854,0.0005997756,0.0006764857,0.00001822546,0.0000375761,0.00005972878,0.00001239239,0.006046851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995993,0.00006365641,0.0001137084,0.00003040559,0.00001025065,0.000009645922,0.00002579812,0.000001260916,0.0001459429],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005607706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01875961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02520472773410929,"score_gpt":0.2960882287897278,"score_spread":0.2708835010556185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}