{"id":"W1989777241","doi":"10.1080/07438140209353937","title":"Watershed Impacts of Logging and Wildfire: Case Studies in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lake and Reservoir Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Université du Québec à Montréal; Lakehead University; University of Alberta; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Boreal; Environmental science; Taiga; Wetland; Watershed; Hydrology (agriculture); Logging; Peat; Disturbance (geology); Biomass (ecology); Subarctic climate; Ecosystem; Biota; Permafrost; Water quality; Ecology; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004642048,0.0003348023,0.0002672124,0.001056599,0.004215556,0.001059912,0.0007824021,0.0006626753,0.00102312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00105994,0.0001901889,0.0002761958,0.003945221,0.001138252,0.0002659959,0.0008671324,0.0006199111,0.00005956396],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02507131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01856115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9838316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995327,0.00007529657,0.00001973561,0.00003316838,0.0001292778,0.0002098374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990495,0.0001443471,0.0001431043,0.00002714075,0.0002925853,0.0003432511],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002231675,0.000562856,0.9452627,0.0001978469,0.0001499705,0.01788652,0.006694409,0.002880181,0.0008064593,0.0008188089,0.00292709,0.02158999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003559721,0.0001638801,0.9539029,0.0001159797,0.00009294625,0.003675498,0.03269986,0.002814473,0.0003876289,0.0002864317,0.005781212,0.00004353454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965116,0.0005987105,0.00008293609,0.0002107644,0.000004682076,0.00005099292,0.0004467473,0.000007410534,0.002086156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975457,0.0009520338,0.0002903697,0.000106344,0.0000045881,0.00001765588,0.0002735599,0.000002870681,0.0008068025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02507131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1819059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01533875147558095,"score_gpt":0.2193168947731401,"score_spread":0.2039781432975592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}