{"id":"W1989779703","doi":"10.3758/s13420-011-0015-9","title":"The criterion-calibration model of cue interaction in contingency judgments","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learning & Behavior","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reciprocal; Contingency; Calibration; Social psychology; Class (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001697732,0.000120505,0.0002221627,0.0002176864,0.0001914717,0.0001737613,0.0005068459,0.00008026766,0.0002407694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008089789,0.00008511049,0.0001078862,0.0002754221,0.00007698482,0.0005686885,0.0001247293,0.0003009037,0.00009026354],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004708408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003498837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001664885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001312487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979399,0.0001825059,0.0008935438,0.0003348788,0.0004441669,0.0002050471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985993,0.0003413915,0.0004787981,0.0003845414,0.0001448321,0.0000511211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008376574,0.0002152935,0.2887762,8.554093e-7,0.000002302504,0.000005006251,0.002728686,0.001719521,0.01062102,0.0002029966,0.0001117658,0.6955326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001650059,0.0006169603,0.6372069,0.0002337529,0.0001238263,0.00002508791,0.009378294,0.3141337,0.01313016,0.01883938,0.00375544,0.0009064964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961045,0.00002229494,0.001985589,0.0000426475,0.0005657278,0.0001587762,0.000002918565,0.00002674014,0.001090814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978895,0.00001305767,0.00117929,0.00002159005,0.00001907346,0.00003190773,0.00000248929,0.00001386797,0.0008291886],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.694626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3470705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2700979804675431,"score_gpt":0.4091390624409513,"score_spread":0.1390410819734082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}