{"id":"W1989779703","doi":"10.3758/s13420-011-0015-9","title":"The criterion-calibration model of cue interaction in contingency judgments","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learning & Behavior","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reciprocal; Contingency; Calibration; Social psychology; Class (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007777059,0.0007223643,0.001441213,0.001340808,0.0008820191,0.003359558,0.002209064,0.002618354,0.01009935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05173375,0.0009863572,0.001196753,0.001288905,0.002272547,0.005086377,0.001667012,0.002760311,0.00115929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001702767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002189165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00531281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003397126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953675,0.002492895,0.0001238013,0.000679599,0.0008853668,0.0004507953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775941,0.0172869,0.001105981,0.001661567,0.001723566,0.0006279238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001097496,0.0007351224,0.01274737,0.0002152171,0.0003802421,0.0003162977,0.001008275,0.2386204,0.005424168,0.6640059,0.003274883,0.07217462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006006525,0.0001074873,0.00562689,0.00002216892,0.00005645428,0.0001120442,0.00008104584,0.5917838,0.0007568136,0.4008131,0.0005181883,0.0000619373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3125562,0.0006126494,0.6439906,0.002756653,0.0001314066,0.0001886457,0.000262272,0.000478155,0.03902354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754393,0.0001216635,0.02051263,0.0001270941,0.00003195419,0.00007842015,0.00005617915,0.00006689411,0.003565866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01009935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04112953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2700979804675431,"score_gpt":0.4091390624409513,"score_spread":0.1390410819734082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}