{"id":"W1989933880","doi":"10.1017/s0025100309003892","title":"The alignment of L + H* pitch accents in Persian intonation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the International Phonetic Association","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Intonation (linguistics); Focus (optics); Vowel; Pitch accent; Consonant; Boundary (topology); Persian; Duration (music); Linguistics; Stress (linguistics); Tone (literature); Speech recognition; Mathematics; Physics; Acoustics; Computer science; Prosody; Philosophy; Mathematical analysis; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001496047,0.00006345733,0.0001196707,0.0001173356,0.00006157532,0.00003134622,0.0006705914,0.00008609064,0.0001334477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000479662,0.0000402732,0.0001123038,0.0001713262,0.00002970925,0.00006151339,0.00004562248,0.0003102499,0.00001393147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005729354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006934838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007368597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005897302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983277,0.0001973515,0.0005064016,0.00007494215,0.0007384302,0.0001551497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983734,0.0002947257,0.0008374764,0.0001304752,0.0003373323,0.00002657848],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00184616,0.002658192,0.6045297,0.000009227355,0.001686432,0.00002677537,0.04029961,0.001353499,0.07945774,0.01043337,0.1009354,0.1567639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008728131,0.0001196443,0.9840515,0.00002655211,0.00001323729,0.00001220709,0.0004266742,0.0001829085,0.001645343,0.009802271,0.002805849,0.00004106023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693606,0.000226204,0.00003774154,0.02287517,0.002685399,0.0001140513,0.000004411879,0.00000184367,0.004694547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972398,0.0001306348,0.00003549406,0.0002447762,0.0001718835,0.000002047977,0.000001243885,0.000004123824,0.002169948],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3795217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1642293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01273743908285816,"score_gpt":0.3278599623688989,"score_spread":0.3151225232860407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}