{"id":"W1989944978","doi":"10.1004/s10506-007-9060-2","title":"A transdisciplinary ontology of innovation governance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Corporate governance; Knowledge management; Function (biology); Intellectual property; Mechanism (biology); Legal aspects of computing; Product (mathematics); Representation (politics); Perspective (graphical); Business; Political science; Computer science; The Internet; Epistemology; Law; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003764209,0.0005035069,0.0006016648,0.003617989,0.003244922,0.008905927,0.001272371,0.003324461,0.003361185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002779518,0.0003614389,0.001218131,0.004788336,0.01951944,0.01395763,0.004765573,0.003897528,0.0006026013],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005791902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004843276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005266065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003704322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955736,0.002299227,0.0003365546,0.0006672233,0.0008199301,0.0003033117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980097,0.0007853188,0.0002035764,0.0005575753,0.0002388039,0.0002050847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[6.550206e-7,0.000002220772,0.00002998246,0.000007499139,0.0000015957,0.00001244675,0.0004478586,0.0001855157,0.00003215731,0.9977412,0.000232705,0.001306092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003270924,0.000002633392,0.00008994588,0.00004015193,0.00000342904,0.00005019681,0.0005781942,0.001271887,0.00004253259,0.9546991,0.04321488,0.000003797242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01388999,0.006669492,0.6087277,0.02649134,0.0005097193,0.0001608403,0.000208409,0.0001706844,0.3431718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.702077,0.01066602,0.2402745,0.004655086,0.0006736545,0.0007587323,0.0004289457,0.0001347026,0.04033131],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008905927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04202342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03205369382559239,"score_gpt":0.2579589043728054,"score_spread":0.225905210547213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}