{"id":"W1989992186","doi":"10.1504/ijccbs.2012.045074","title":"MDG-SAT: an automated methodology for efficient safety checking","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Critical Computer-Based Systems","topic":"Formal Methods in Verification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Correctness; Computer science; Model checking; Formal verification; Boolean satisfiability problem; Satisfiability modulo theories; Programming language; Theoretical computer science; Satisfiability; Automated theorem proving; Invariant (physics); Symbolic execution; Set (abstract data type); ENCODE; Mathematics; Software","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003066006,0.001460756,0.001026209,0.002260097,0.0008782545,0.001622013,0.002958271,0.001214889,0.006877075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007494408,0.001108657,0.002075401,0.001110214,0.001804292,0.002292992,0.002406724,0.001998686,0.001540033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001243613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003420247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002715541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004197023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967603,0.001425736,0.0001976192,0.0004046102,0.001006184,0.0002055251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953607,0.002984319,0.0003338547,0.0008519637,0.0004054362,0.00006371376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003133032,0.0004085739,0.00325467,0.001283084,0.0003415331,0.0007160896,0.0003895728,0.3005301,0.02922268,0.1864098,0.01287184,0.4642588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001204163,0.0001139444,0.0002527111,0.00009111092,0.00006109441,0.0002804758,0.00004137637,0.8929367,0.02267351,0.06794439,0.01544436,0.00003996339],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001843451,0.00005727575,0.9931242,0.00007261479,0.00002033405,0.0001430393,0.0001664842,0.003889545,0.0006831819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06402507,0.0001321108,0.9331331,0.0001045994,0.00002313907,0.0004456311,0.0006637751,0.0004578377,0.001014792],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006877075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02300608,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1242519919006009,"score_gpt":0.4393031532817571,"score_spread":0.3150511613811562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}