{"id":"W1990096515","doi":"10.5539/enrr.v5n2p135","title":"Using Bioretention Retrofits to Meet Virginia’s New Stormwater Management Regulations: A Case Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","topic":"Urban Stormwater Management Solutions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bioretention; Watershed; Environmental science; Surface runoff; Low-impact development; Stormwater; Hydrograph; Hydrology (agriculture); Storm; Time of concentration; Sizing; Runoff curve number; Runoff model; Stormwater management; Environmental engineering; Water resource management; Computer science; Engineering; Meteorology; Ecology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001447589,0.0002214534,0.0001676992,0.0003552789,0.000523604,0.0001542191,0.0003125966,0.00006255685,0.0003682477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003160337,0.0001896526,0.00004386563,0.0005460107,0.0002331031,0.0003809294,0.001655813,0.0002321218,0.0004374774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008642431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006002329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002616408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004403064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965605,0.0003389818,0.0002906517,0.0007070728,0.001467279,0.0006355795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988617,0.00003774432,0.0000514571,0.0005265349,0.00001033403,0.0005122823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009170651,0.001482765,0.7358916,0.0000576457,0.0005202465,0.00555006,0.0617748,0.01514397,0.007343588,0.0004659214,0.1313131,0.03953912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006233254,0.002398855,0.4208151,0.0000909936,0.0003201129,0.0005231733,0.05561798,0.0139568,0.0003678699,0.00166946,0.4961953,0.001811085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950891,0.0002237117,0.0002643504,0.0005602776,0.00009768496,0.001471099,0.000002673073,0.00004514341,0.002246025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739191,0.00001546658,0.003981449,0.00004872615,0.00008763044,0.00005210235,0.000004633319,0.00002770567,0.02186318],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3648821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7733808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1107086188913709,"score_gpt":0.3447129512496311,"score_spread":0.2340043323582602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}