{"id":"W1990096515","doi":"10.5539/enrr.v5n2p135","title":"Using Bioretention Retrofits to Meet Virginia’s New Stormwater Management Regulations: A Case Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","topic":"Urban Stormwater Management Solutions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bioretention; Watershed; Environmental science; Surface runoff; Low-impact development; Stormwater; Hydrograph; Hydrology (agriculture); Storm; Time of concentration; Sizing; Runoff curve number; Runoff model; Stormwater management; Environmental engineering; Water resource management; Computer science; Engineering; Meteorology; Ecology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008751904,0.0007380054,0.0004135092,0.0006973373,0.001071286,0.001475811,0.001366623,0.0009371199,0.0009816637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001009234,0.000320298,0.0007686445,0.0006944904,0.000577886,0.0006177265,0.0006501975,0.0004334133,0.000153879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00330413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002556491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06284466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1507244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994529,0.0001467231,0.00001684718,0.00007794085,0.0001312436,0.0001743017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990859,0.0004363252,0.0000956642,0.00008451214,0.0001921061,0.000105544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002414525,0.0007970255,0.03923991,0.0000472383,0.00005377457,0.002329169,0.0002391551,0.9251935,0.005787973,0.003180895,0.001225293,0.02166459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009258175,0.001339663,0.01523662,0.00002257894,0.00009146039,0.0003386199,0.001440861,0.9588004,0.01532916,0.001772478,0.005480537,0.00005500247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991568,0.00003625733,0.004497592,0.00006011181,0.00000790159,0.00008686807,0.0001108617,0.00005745336,0.003574969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898114,0.00007650573,0.007571099,0.00001481789,0.000003558544,0.00004564041,0.0001232726,0.00001052365,0.002343207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06284466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1249577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1107086188913709,"score_gpt":0.3447129512496311,"score_spread":0.2340043323582602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}