{"id":"W1990172583","doi":"10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb05475.x","title":"DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT OF WATER IN ONTARIO MUNICIPALITIES: STATUS, PROGRESS, AND OPPORTUNITIES<sup>1</sup>","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Business; Metropolitan area; Water conservation; Environmental planning; Demand side; Population; Demand management; Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Water resources; Environmental science; Economics; Geography; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009978642,0.00014768,0.0001520127,0.0006372004,0.001842843,0.001310889,0.0006023128,0.0003776176,0.00233388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002611351,0.0002158975,0.000181393,0.00246424,0.0007010257,0.0005462877,0.0008414136,0.0002922693,0.0002041214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02708698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03700832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.964531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998847,0.0001281912,0.00006130755,0.00007198074,0.0004464626,0.000444943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948912,0.0003740879,0.001263131,0.0001080431,0.002078858,0.001284729],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000145209,0.0001372992,0.9237042,0.0003583106,0.00002926052,0.000276961,0.01725394,0.0004365864,0.001419564,0.0008270472,0.005859908,0.04955169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006516843,0.0000479784,0.9768134,0.00005078255,0.000008085707,0.00002600089,0.01001336,0.0002774121,0.0001751586,0.00004967519,0.01252073,0.00001083349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843934,0.0009519948,0.0001325994,0.002628902,0.00001016994,0.0000733639,0.001209567,0.00001427371,0.01058567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953803,0.000677702,0.0002224908,0.000107979,0.000006181926,0.00003385964,0.0005367881,0.000003368753,0.003031358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.035469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1965307,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01301160380876781,"score_gpt":0.2011066561077857,"score_spread":0.1880950522990179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}