{"id":"W1990174240","doi":"10.1167/9.8.191","title":"Consequences of visual selective attention for evaluations of affectively positive and negative stimuli","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vision","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Cued speech; Selective attention; Cognitive psychology; Subliminal stimuli; Cognition; Developmental psychology; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007235294,0.0006407297,0.0003539275,0.0004048248,0.0002559034,0.00047882,0.0003313563,0.0003785201,0.00202079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003962918,0.0003242293,0.0002856331,0.0001308208,0.0005359544,0.0002754377,0.0005803221,0.000731356,0.0001873814],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003174465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000219313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001465621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001699726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994512,0.0001005639,0.00004737182,0.00008179265,0.0001979889,0.000121017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997486,0.001297637,0.0004876071,0.0002332399,0.000163928,0.0003314805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003407955,0.0001780162,0.002874298,0.00006166409,0.00002672527,0.0002239922,0.0001126409,0.0001374504,0.988901,0.0001301605,0.00009190875,0.003854136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005659563,0.006756906,0.4425218,0.00003840365,0.0001879966,0.001541442,0.0002750586,0.003416486,0.5427138,0.001305598,0.0006220388,0.00005450352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972085,0.00008482792,0.000738855,0.00005120642,0.00002142649,0.00002581777,0.0000312331,0.00002441225,0.001813736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982581,0.00007716882,0.0006999035,0.00008874964,0.00001363335,0.00003695037,0.00007014544,0.0000313875,0.000723838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00202079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00676018,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1020296956999092,"score_gpt":0.4718236057186349,"score_spread":0.3697939100187257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}