{"id":"W1990311848","doi":"10.1016/j.orl.2008.09.004","title":"Evaluating a warm standby system with components having proportional hazard rates","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research Letters","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Component (thermodynamics); Statistics; Proportional hazards model; Hazard ratio; Hazard; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Mathematics; Control theory (sociology); Engineering; Physics; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Control (management)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007983124,0.000111662,0.0001254946,0.0001588953,0.0007765029,0.0001201829,0.000128539,0.00003833717,0.00004013316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001052426,0.00009242679,0.00002634113,0.0003674211,0.0001824187,0.0003706643,0.00002726033,0.0002940689,0.00004978631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003836619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009803803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009955006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006224801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983221,0.0001478705,0.0002376413,0.0002186147,0.0007175168,0.0003562988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999231,0.00006128287,0.00001055596,0.0002281931,0.0003861194,0.00008277981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001694581,0.00002042582,0.0009591958,0.00006703673,0.00002221384,0.00002022138,0.0003772593,0.9477332,0.04915335,0.0002777306,0.00123325,0.0001191482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003883187,0.00006493382,0.001752438,0.0001389093,0.000004006794,0.00004830636,0.0002457018,0.9942729,0.002738543,0.000001766033,0.0002105973,0.0001335776],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9185339,0.00004084357,0.07894967,0.001006667,0.00007599298,0.0006101073,0.00001019016,0.0001727377,0.0005999511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823138,0.00003163272,0.01704375,0.00004233354,0.00007232487,0.0002405743,0.00008218912,0.00002813628,0.0001453088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06377991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5972311,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1038903510729244,"score_gpt":0.3509936052648227,"score_spread":0.2471032541918983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}