{"id":"W1990353653","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2005.04.007","title":"The cyclopean eye is relevant for predicting visual direction","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vision Research","topic":"Visual perception and processing mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Monocular; Perception; Psychology; Monocular vision; Fixation (population genetics); Binocular vision; Visual perception; Psychophysics; Depth perception; Optometry; Computer vision; Optics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Physics; Neuroscience; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002374804,0.000327668,0.0002567157,0.0003557093,0.0003858612,0.001347072,0.000298931,0.0005708318,0.003585393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002477629,0.0002478423,0.0002550962,0.0003015352,0.0003503427,0.001145284,0.0003608951,0.0005319942,0.0005317678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002732239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004853639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002151884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003008758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999003,0.00001105589,0.000003868287,0.00004411259,0.00002298801,0.00001771863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994792,0.0002151598,0.000100722,0.0000576576,0.00009504934,0.00005227133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001095788,0.00008715868,0.01531816,0.0002644249,0.00007279617,0.0005480329,0.0001913329,0.002146028,0.8736575,0.01643114,0.004130512,0.08605713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004861351,0.0009816102,0.5719426,0.0002565041,0.0003408586,0.002883696,0.0005744285,0.08306693,0.2050187,0.1161626,0.01814977,0.0001361289],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9027304,0.003288881,0.04440806,0.001569081,0.001118161,0.0001003921,0.0006717301,0.0003086616,0.0458046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875836,0.001446082,0.006583264,0.0003782813,0.0001447149,0.00002052313,0.0002656951,0.00006630056,0.00351154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003585393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01199436,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1280506866996047,"score_gpt":0.4881613008396687,"score_spread":0.360110614140064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}