{"id":"W1990368073","doi":"10.1186/1471-2288-12-111","title":"Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":226,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; SickKids Foundation; University of Toronto; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; MEDLINE; CINAHL; Study heterogeneity; Protocol (science); Clinical trial; Medicine; Meta-analysis; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Psychological intervention; Pathology; Nursing; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5815932,0.005059206,0.0184843,0.06862366,0.003580405,0.01735367,0.008351729,0.007347325,0.009013036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8167039,0.006314594,0.01974303,0.05790581,0.009559494,0.01839628,0.01222135,0.005844813,0.001641348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02171335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05251637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005061754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01002822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1884339,0.5588197,0.1877348,0.01283741,0.05072735,0.001446896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1304567,0.7416944,0.06901836,0.0206643,0.03709432,0.001071965],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003594069,0.00005139924,0.002044974,0.8636336,0.01428405,0.0001281595,0.002548737,0.0005497748,0.0001809443,0.00581517,0.005497012,0.1049068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009905979,0.0002232863,0.001852307,0.9155721,0.03650047,0.0003779045,0.00113344,0.001253261,0.0004610769,0.01926764,0.02213661,0.0002313301],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002560359,0.8300479,0.1029349,0.0133274,0.003325061,0.04237283,0.002677765,0.0004603847,0.002293347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07064302,0.3791067,0.3862244,0.007266354,0.001515598,0.1528924,0.001515558,0.0002933187,0.0005426612],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4184068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5159702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9933136472504177,"score_gpt":0.804038130845693,"score_spread":0.1892755164047247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}