{"id":"W1990368073","doi":"10.1186/1471-2288-12-111","title":"Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":226,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; SickKids Foundation; University of Toronto; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; MEDLINE; CINAHL; Study heterogeneity; Protocol (science); Clinical trial; Medicine; Meta-analysis; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Psychological intervention; Pathology; Nursing; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9805543,0.001137536,0.05856532,0.002429079,0.0001297432,0.0002896066,0.01611515,0.002104706,0.003255606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9872727,0.0003982818,0.01060323,0.01450854,0.001482716,0.0002110444,0.001742409,0.00710677,0.00154568],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001832127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00269739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003917351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003809578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.01887619,0.8924771,0.06483344,0.002753131,0.01953466,0.00152551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.01609568,0.939724,0.02673195,0.0135806,0.002829575,0.00103818],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002065211,0.00009646996,0.0005615427,0.6425956,0.00009825917,0.00003136013,0.0002232492,6.192201e-8,5.302788e-8,0.001139843,0.004141504,0.35111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001018834,0.00006492716,0.00009341751,0.5393328,0.0006723785,0.0002085859,0.0001138221,0.00003363115,4.889717e-8,0.002819546,0.4563399,0.0002191088],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008515306,0.9725053,0.01314172,0.0004745347,0.0005764195,0.01271078,0.00001727229,0.000004462138,0.0005609646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000001493392,0.8602348,0.1345865,0.001185456,0.0004138548,0.00324169,0.00002675012,0.00003526211,0.0002742149],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4521984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9933136472504177,"score_gpt":0.804038130845693,"score_spread":0.1892755164047247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}