{"id":"W1990413489","doi":"10.1177/1367006914527019","title":"The categorization of the relative complementizer phrase in third-language English: A feature re-assembly account","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Bilingualism","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Complementizer; Definiteness; Linguistics; Interlanguage; Referent; Computer science; Feature (linguistics); Noun phrase; Categorization; Modern Standard Arabic; Focus (optics); Second-language acquisition; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Syntax; Noun; Arabic","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009205916,0.000325483,0.0001727008,0.0007078201,0.0007331742,0.00204545,0.0007847063,0.0008347398,0.003559741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003314571,0.0002496735,0.0004033592,0.0003811452,0.002143989,0.003518501,0.001162107,0.0009606168,0.0008005861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005357077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005874271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003436603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002430109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995481,0.0001083192,0.00002025027,0.0001281048,0.0001308561,0.00006438284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978054,0.001069636,0.0002723955,0.0003194968,0.0004070818,0.0001260727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000868723,0.0003445788,0.06931872,0.0005620377,0.00007831514,0.003445878,0.1304903,0.003259911,0.3988527,0.1731112,0.001130989,0.2185367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001341968,0.00224452,0.4698303,0.0003712714,0.0003129573,0.01131128,0.06929015,0.06255779,0.1851691,0.1572955,0.04111048,0.0003725229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9505364,0.000159635,0.02702888,0.0002067726,0.00001192955,0.00003275305,0.0000432823,0.00011598,0.02186448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934052,0.00005069526,0.004362622,0.00002610666,0.000004236137,0.00001822045,0.00005875741,0.00002782482,0.002046429],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003559741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01190853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01696740423243186,"score_gpt":0.274366349945441,"score_spread":0.2573989457130091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}