{"id":"W1990513818","doi":"10.1353/tjt.2011.0058","title":"Reading James with New Eyes: Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of James (review)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Watson; Rhetorical question; Reading (process); Rhetoric; Philosophy; Theology; Classics; Art history; History; Literature; Art; Linguistics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004800165,0.0000836173,0.0003991234,0.00002247797,0.00004703653,0.000003962865,0.0002542291,0.00003199462,0.005235462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001287071,0.00003714672,0.0001446434,0.00001751009,0.0003146653,0.0001487791,0.0000562302,0.0001059644,0.000001202504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002365646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002283306,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001657201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004367104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990396,0.0002396006,0.0004155932,0.00006409507,0.0001352022,0.0001059012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998826,0.0001880028,0.0006478466,0.000113351,0.0001948256,0.00002991992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00119239,0.0003108909,0.008990191,0.0003526196,0.001353815,0.000006584052,0.05587343,0.000001870021,0.0004921607,0.6053773,0.2903394,0.03570937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002911405,0.0103334,0.07401797,0.004864515,0.001903739,0.0002341757,0.02119488,0.00002085694,0.004972822,0.07711951,0.8017764,0.0006503265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1044136,0.1439104,0.006052217,0.0104748,0.002431152,0.0005795683,0.00001380353,0.00002131485,0.7321031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790537,0.007699395,0.003964235,0.006878708,0.000462752,0.000002837888,3.775126e-7,0.000012268,0.001925776],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1147418934130139,"score_gpt":0.3273473164695904,"score_spread":0.2126054230565765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}