{"id":"W1990513818","doi":"10.1353/tjt.2011.0058","title":"Reading James with New Eyes: Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of James (review)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Watson; Rhetorical question; Reading (process); Rhetoric; Philosophy; Theology; Classics; Art history; History; Literature; Art; Linguistics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1324072,0.001900266,0.006150397,0.01692589,0.002478777,0.01360707,0.004780719,0.007376225,0.006757549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4056693,0.001970049,0.003131106,0.02119144,0.008933841,0.01390059,0.005452395,0.007569729,0.001717736],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01361736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03448735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01053412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01377007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8342654,0.1145669,0.02320639,0.005821803,0.02033326,0.001806269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5789828,0.2814984,0.05152429,0.0124297,0.07094047,0.00462434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002553321,0.00003296118,0.0004996076,0.1879399,0.001326956,0.0002227802,0.005684549,0.0001331442,0.0002027424,0.01427761,0.5823477,0.2070767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009357426,0.00006282985,0.001099335,0.2571113,0.0006917327,0.0002624021,0.002880298,0.00004923564,0.0001137344,0.004699713,0.7328469,0.00008892004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001320735,0.9426851,0.0002445346,0.04130476,0.01506891,0.00008505539,0.00008963256,0.000008697304,0.0003812749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006381057,0.9062145,0.002059867,0.0636044,0.0185955,0.00141207,0.0002757236,0.0000658583,0.001391038],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1324072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7002448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1147418934130139,"score_gpt":0.3273473164695904,"score_spread":0.2126054230565765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}