{"id":"W1990860811","doi":"10.1103/physreva.78.042318","title":"Chaos, entanglement, and decoherence in the quantum kicked top","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review A","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Quantum decoherence; Quantum entanglement; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Quantum chaos; Qubit; Squashed entanglement; Floquet theory; Quantum; Statistical physics; Classical mechanics; Quantum dynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003964089,0.0003288808,0.0006751254,0.0005507536,0.0008485193,0.001365834,0.0006368257,0.0006521915,0.0011297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001349498,0.0002440922,0.0004422256,0.0004661217,0.002675185,0.001608664,0.001276509,0.0006894125,0.00008651103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007275905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004303624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002370626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001582979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999835,0.00004292607,0.000005784666,0.00002397906,0.00004130333,0.00005083867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994412,0.0002662788,0.0001122721,0.00007011776,0.00003746682,0.00007278581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002107771,0.00009484636,0.003242702,0.0001289905,0.00009996653,0.0006840612,0.0004602619,0.364314,0.03315448,0.5927128,0.0004430973,0.004454106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003152977,0.00008625545,0.001287533,0.00001322684,0.0000275962,0.00009679869,0.0001134359,0.8570478,0.002822699,0.1378676,0.0005613392,0.00004428577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9452599,0.0005934329,0.04707148,0.0004222626,0.00003929362,0.00001613611,0.00004016967,0.00003081584,0.006526527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959603,0.0002301731,0.00283743,0.00001981896,0.000013252,0.00001074502,0.00001162604,0.000008643438,0.0009079322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002370626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005279064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02669624376868548,"score_gpt":0.2965513469197605,"score_spread":0.2698551031510751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}