{"id":"W1990888975","doi":"10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1238:adater]2.0.co;2","title":"A Dynamical Approach To Evaluate Risk In Resource Management","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge; University of Guelph; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Climate change; Population; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental resource management; Natural (archaeology); Natural resource management; Ecology; Natural resource; Ecosystem management; Ecosystem; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Geography; Environmental science; Biology; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003704355,0.00009803155,0.000111761,0.00003804183,0.0001420993,0.00002144132,0.0003455816,0.000064986,0.000233632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007592776,0.00007672521,0.0000375935,0.0005162551,0.00007431886,0.00002582033,0.0002776783,0.0001190649,0.001282233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002317652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002049179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001364992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004514693,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987752,0.00006559936,0.0002379635,0.0004533791,0.0001936748,0.0002741276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995269,0.00004886672,0.00004979789,0.0002873753,0.000003148281,0.00008390726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002634156,0.004117643,0.2717503,0.00002708446,0.00001278155,0.00001174313,0.00008541419,0.5691976,0.0005326753,0.1279295,0.006822983,0.01948585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000176897,0.00002675939,0.8872803,0.000002155737,0.000007464475,0.0000025007,0.00005139636,0.06495119,0.000002891201,0.009401272,0.0379554,0.0001417463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4791082,0.000008140748,0.0383416,0.0003715327,0.000009929841,0.001322622,0.00001064578,0.00005754713,0.4807698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798996,0.000004717845,0.01680319,0.0001563285,0.00001755445,0.00149418,0.00001577544,0.000006268562,0.001602324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005407222199845759,"score_gpt":0.2179104233275518,"score_spread":0.212503201127706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}