{"id":"W1990963948","doi":"10.5539/mas.v5n5p118","title":"An Improvement for the Locally One-Dimensional Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Finite-difference time-domain method; Divergence (linguistics); Zero (linguistics); Electric field; Significant difference; Mathematical analysis; Finite difference method; Domain (mathematical analysis); Magnetic field; Mathematics; Computer science; Applied mathematics; Physics; Algorithm; Optics; Quantum mechanics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005148737,0.0003745294,0.000558183,0.0004195609,0.0003052427,0.0004685884,0.001589292,0.0005373053,0.003094303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00161917,0.0001990125,0.0006852774,0.0004553279,0.0003576562,0.00108283,0.0007158628,0.001077419,0.001119361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003436238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007356562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001957092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001434478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995616,0.0000919023,0.00002491636,0.00005538411,0.0002467056,0.00001956943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994791,0.0001610685,0.0000246973,0.0000876354,0.0002262187,0.00002132861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001862884,0.0001264661,0.001630632,0.0007647625,0.00009259708,0.0004115766,0.0004306565,0.164803,0.1247805,0.09797538,0.008448309,0.6003498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003266902,0.00006282035,0.0002540398,0.00002891764,0.00002636989,0.0003185127,0.0000241244,0.9558675,0.01452013,0.005976351,0.02285585,0.00003274526],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001904187,0.0002113172,0.9959576,0.00007607529,0.00005867295,0.00002141358,0.00001587923,0.0003225019,0.0014324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09558273,0.0006535902,0.8979632,0.0001563201,0.00009489465,0.0001733443,0.0001464799,0.000207082,0.0050224],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003094303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01035154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03096504036852321,"score_gpt":0.2774067538254886,"score_spread":0.2464417134569654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}