{"id":"W1990963948","doi":"10.5539/mas.v5n5p118","title":"An Improvement for the Locally One-Dimensional Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Finite-difference time-domain method; Divergence (linguistics); Zero (linguistics); Electric field; Significant difference; Mathematical analysis; Finite difference method; Domain (mathematical analysis); Magnetic field; Mathematics; Computer science; Applied mathematics; Physics; Algorithm; Optics; Quantum mechanics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001070277,0.0001422153,0.0001408968,0.00006266406,0.0002439235,0.00004480425,0.0005358488,0.00004415252,0.0001248089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003853839,0.0001052536,0.00003416616,0.0003094712,0.0001940056,0.00006490333,0.00004650631,0.0001201334,0.00002256207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004652576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004993719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006753138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001603375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987099,0.00002249217,0.0001927022,0.0003342682,0.0003461278,0.0003945335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989656,0.0004212846,0.00003147941,0.0003846056,0.00005741825,0.00013964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000242955,0.00003600096,0.000002921299,0.000004465708,0.000005564378,1.176378e-7,0.0003725688,0.01771407,0.8255972,0.002318354,0.000008954837,0.1539154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021627,0.0001562364,0.0007333594,0.000002418829,0.000008629724,5.163118e-7,0.0000131763,0.8729221,0.09509881,0.03064357,0.0000630864,0.000141815],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0196751,0.00002925085,0.9769478,0.00003569646,0.00008453116,0.0004260051,0.000003117987,0.0001594065,0.002639056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6015394,8.935068e-7,0.3980304,0.0002443249,0.00002221863,0.00009104236,9.549177e-7,0.0000139058,0.00005691513],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.855208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4292118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03096504036852321,"score_gpt":0.2774067538254886,"score_spread":0.2464417134569654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}