{"id":"W1991039288","doi":"10.1080/07388940802397509","title":"State Fragility and Implications for Aid Allocation: An Empirical Analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conflict Management and Peace Science","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Fragility; Legitimacy; CLARITY; Extant taxon; Empirical research; Poverty; State (computer science); Terrorism; Public economics; Economics; Positive economics; Political science; Politics; Computer science; Economic growth; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004954493,0.0002896992,0.0003978285,0.003084087,0.001128389,0.001978052,0.001009452,0.0009162329,0.01772828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03844482,0.000214152,0.0009006616,0.005124013,0.002361917,0.002306559,0.002025279,0.00203465,0.000618711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001878633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001400336,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009223582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007594109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973617,0.001487364,0.0001429996,0.0001765775,0.000318219,0.0005130837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8845235,0.09553005,0.01321869,0.001308329,0.003431061,0.001988424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002574723,0.0004974703,0.9612189,0.00010763,0.0002113585,0.0006088818,0.001235489,0.0105029,0.0001186729,0.01063702,0.001303941,0.01330027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008367345,0.0004639532,0.9087158,0.0002003823,0.0004424557,0.0005584775,0.01695618,0.0564578,0.0004905518,0.01157823,0.004004388,0.00004814356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939567,0.0002372716,0.0007893599,0.0008234238,0.000006431321,0.00004305615,0.0003534881,0.00001158714,0.003778721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991133,0.0001686918,0.0001501449,0.00003711318,0.00001670176,0.00002338037,0.0001626963,0.000002589763,0.000325383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01772828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05930704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07647757675056414,"score_gpt":0.3836742047529315,"score_spread":0.3071966280023673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}