{"id":"W1991088917","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.006","title":"Evaluating China's urban environmental sustainability with Data Envelopment Analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; World Bank Group","keywords":"Sustainability; Environmental Sustainability Index; Data envelopment analysis; Per capita; Beijing; China; Sustainable development; Urbanization; Gross domestic product; Benchmarking; Index (typography); Natural resource economics; Geography; Business; Economic growth; Economics; Population; Statistics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009478276,0.000229235,0.0006060726,0.0003170477,0.0004158252,0.0003781226,0.002417793,0.0001581047,0.004605859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004295504,0.0001529633,0.000186143,0.0008045993,0.0004924591,0.0004323402,0.001099915,0.0004201786,0.0002451213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000284967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002448352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000327802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009637036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962726,0.0002778401,0.0009474817,0.00150749,0.0005404605,0.0004541408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995318,0.001366154,0.0004940247,0.00254221,0.00006907123,0.0002105358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005935046,0.0007041156,0.8853264,0.000001355191,0.0003712085,0.0000125382,0.0003340647,0.07238413,0.0001232366,0.001316939,0.0003902325,0.03897636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002030455,0.000126461,0.7030936,2.586238e-7,0.0002020551,0.000003284418,0.0003097663,0.2868168,0.0000278308,0.004688092,0.004309784,0.0002189511],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952045,0.000008973715,0.001711769,0.001257465,0.0001472624,0.0002350333,0.00005678293,0.00003531237,0.001342881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889179,0.000004791058,0.01015412,0.0002092597,0.00007197775,0.00001343099,0.0000908065,0.000008551052,0.0005291748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2144327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0911556531172484,"score_gpt":0.3859296661094064,"score_spread":0.294774012992158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}