{"id":"W1991093920","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-3802.2009.01111.x","title":"Choosing ‘stereotypes’: debating the efficacy of (British) disability‐criticism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Contingency; Psychology; sort; Disability studies; Inclusion (mineral); Citation; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005000215,0.00005452087,0.0001685426,0.0002156385,0.0003558249,0.0001549852,0.0004520099,0.00006133691,0.0005290406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002298865,0.00004248187,0.0001151557,0.001164276,0.00143226,0.0004068583,0.0000252972,0.0004658989,0.00000567887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003240226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009369266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002842347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001589353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968628,0.0007226016,0.0005798846,0.000104148,0.001429091,0.0003014499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964138,0.0023747,0.0001700159,0.0001357232,0.0007758175,0.0001298983],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003360466,0.004166732,0.06196585,0.00006893913,0.00004349912,0.00001167476,0.06957948,0.0002398398,0.0004166402,0.5856304,0.01692833,0.2606125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006818672,0.0002048094,0.5843366,0.0003644932,0.00001040384,0.00002129393,0.04473079,0.00001691463,0.00006785352,0.3336252,0.0358227,0.0001170433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8708611,0.0001870352,0.000007413042,0.07884534,0.0007684098,0.0002336708,0.000002303352,0.000002567944,0.04909216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912511,0.00008305381,0.0002821763,0.00005983653,0.007232265,0.00000196365,0.00000111259,0.00000404876,0.00108449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5223708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5792624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07977152035479543,"score_gpt":0.4655227165757135,"score_spread":0.3857511962209181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}