{"id":"W1991093920","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-3802.2009.01111.x","title":"Choosing ‘stereotypes’: debating the efficacy of (British) disability‐criticism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Contingency; Psychology; sort; Disability studies; Inclusion (mineral); Citation; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07188065,0.0006599806,0.0008410247,0.006556557,0.01604462,0.0175842,0.003423159,0.00761279,0.003545668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09618694,0.0006927704,0.0003776338,0.004369686,0.09423163,0.01589119,0.01388251,0.008220467,0.0004835809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02047916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005740887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03428519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03368188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9054013,0.07325708,0.001771064,0.002925815,0.01356369,0.003080916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8934714,0.08698553,0.005367583,0.004428532,0.008293179,0.001453786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000326284,0.000007618184,0.0009067997,0.0001453625,0.000008010787,0.0001453426,0.6008545,0.00006029713,0.0002359524,0.3870845,0.002552321,0.00796674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004358209,0.000041103,0.002702361,0.001259758,0.00002627794,0.0004328033,0.5518201,0.0007889601,0.0007897935,0.2911133,0.1508915,0.00009046098],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4394698,0.01288074,0.02575094,0.1713113,0.00234043,0.00008985381,0.00005506511,0.0001410986,0.3479608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992115,0.0007971145,0.0008584171,0.002630498,0.0001846623,0.0000270498,0.000006600755,0.00006508396,0.003315712],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07188065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3801458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07977152035479543,"score_gpt":0.4655227165757135,"score_spread":0.3857511962209181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}