{"id":"W1991099123","doi":"10.1038/npre.2008.1739.1","title":"Review of the Carbon Dioxide Splitting Patent Literature","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Nature Precedings","topic":"Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon dioxide; Carbon sequestration; Environmental science; Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere; Carbon fibers; Negative carbon dioxide emission; Electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide; Greenhouse gas; Atmosphere (unit); Natural resource economics; Chemistry; Computer science; Physics; Ecology; Meteorology; Carbon monoxide; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002148998,0.0008041146,0.001311616,0.01748836,0.0006046013,0.002349359,0.001214289,0.001357207,0.01021638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008239946,0.000431996,0.0008167101,0.02163026,0.0006703744,0.003031459,0.00060921,0.0007949114,0.002099015],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00143269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004644151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003047473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003562683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985505,0.0002025348,0.0002590524,0.0001758194,0.0007282549,0.00008386197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905348,0.005018079,0.001439745,0.000189726,0.002632203,0.0001852556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001022534,0.00007469188,0.000636371,0.05332208,0.0001525631,0.0007366245,0.0001809661,0.0004568831,0.001419222,0.005774423,0.06345907,0.8736849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001448448,0.0000996479,0.003196823,0.02833641,0.0003378309,0.00132169,0.0001640865,0.0001420161,0.001047811,0.001991862,0.9633232,0.00002414597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00073514,0.9933108,0.0002356301,0.000891599,0.0003443707,0.0000198564,0.0002033113,0.00001390912,0.004245313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003564195,0.9942878,0.0003086377,0.0003635503,0.0003302747,0.00001527623,0.0002649098,0.000004743336,0.0008606607],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03417718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0121359531264806,"score_gpt":0.2209492050064714,"score_spread":0.2088132518799908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}