{"id":"W1991180302","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.016","title":"Understanding the inherent complexity of sustainable consumption: A social cognitive framework","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Research","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":415,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainable consumption; Consumption (sociology); Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Determinism; Cognition; Sustainable development; Reciprocal; Computer science; Sustainability; Management science; Environmental economics; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Ecology; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003200314,0.00007502553,0.0001578902,0.00007875104,0.0004956758,0.00003756662,0.000246572,0.00006399777,0.003531391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008442794,0.00005115093,0.00006297939,0.0006233469,0.002247153,0.0003953194,0.0002686218,0.0005191549,0.00003714501],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001191536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008321358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001027841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006293034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977925,0.0004472243,0.0003072888,0.00008595092,0.0009495285,0.0004174727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989163,0.0004727473,0.0001993286,0.0001113784,0.00018698,0.0001132577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003826334,0.00137828,0.941699,0.0001881668,0.00005288811,0.00001343414,0.01836004,0.0001223942,0.0003842312,0.03137186,0.004972764,0.001074319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002448091,0.00004177443,0.9184516,0.00002814683,0.00001157078,0.00001842323,0.05853342,0.00001061203,0.0001395359,0.02116717,0.001294634,0.00005831076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.984148,0.0001515956,0.008988872,0.003622239,0.0001146513,0.0002837457,0.00000198839,0.000002614573,0.002686355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992687,0.0000447558,0.0001917765,0.00005829749,0.000144155,0.00000645662,8.009143e-7,0.000007012124,0.0002780432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04017339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3395483845261759,"score_gpt":0.42494165781125,"score_spread":0.08539327328507418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}