{"id":"W1991231471","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00356.x","title":"Relating Consumer Willingness‐to‐Pay for Food Safety to Risk Tolerance: An Experimental Approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Food safety; Willingness to pay; Bidding; Risk perception; Business; Common value auction; Food safety risk analysis; Marketing; Actuarial science; Perception; Risk analysis (engineering); Psychology; Economics; Medicine; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001041636,0.0004339996,0.0009545565,0.0004015266,0.0004968987,0.000226686,0.0006523128,0.0002105237,0.0004055649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001326711,0.0004367748,0.0003677817,0.0001339538,0.00006906196,0.001234095,0.00003521072,0.0003361345,0.0003096795],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004077556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002210667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00633914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2276582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963134,0.0000316372,0.001902059,0.0007573891,0.00001086397,0.0009846806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958614,0.00008514888,0.001198921,0.0003784787,0.00007597154,0.002400058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002368378,0.0001718446,0.1975603,0.0000503071,0.0004712109,0.000004367066,0.01303541,0.6853047,0.0001642203,0.09188055,0.005680833,0.005439428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004943657,0.003390002,0.6597065,0.0001061146,0.0001207642,0.0003705081,0.008239048,0.007461352,0.0008249534,0.004908409,0.3070352,0.002893509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913461,0.0006309762,0.0005799279,0.001587131,0.001332471,0.0008629463,0.001657103,0.00001305315,0.001990296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875072,0.00005076932,0.009065952,0.001048183,0.001430609,0.00008297065,0.0001185416,0.00006430276,0.0006315283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6778433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06200229297586083,"score_gpt":0.1836355354781661,"score_spread":0.1216332425023053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}