{"id":"W1991282983","doi":"10.1023/b:bioc.0000006503.90980.e8","title":"Rain forest ‘conservation-through-use’? Chambira palm fibre extraction and handicraft production in a land-constrained community, Peruvian Amazon","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Agroforestry; Handicraft; Amazon rainforest; Livelihood; Deforestation (computer science); Palm; Geography; Production (economics); Biodiversity; Scarcity; Peasant; Business; Agriculture; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005555394,0.0001042079,0.0001424694,0.00005281959,0.002161607,0.0001023069,0.00004978934,0.0001429197,0.00007235315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004433875,0.0001004551,0.00002458569,0.0002384407,0.00075985,0.0007009551,0.00003542016,0.0001755532,0.000006253335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006691103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004508441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06095881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07693903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988896,0.0004432335,0.0001495063,0.0001930839,0.0001396044,0.0001850331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995002,0.0001776604,0.00009588771,0.00007993739,0.00009336481,0.00005296852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000457628,0.00007708681,0.9804054,0.00001811708,0.00001165901,0.000002834485,0.008696321,0.000001512887,0.00007157668,0.008018979,0.001557967,0.001092812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006375738,0.0001088995,0.9018969,0.00003437773,0.00001948443,0.000003473209,0.03025463,0.00003930656,0.00006920438,0.003092866,0.06366257,0.0001806826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807364,0.0001340747,0.0001172279,0.01691341,0.0001534667,0.0003213019,0.00001243278,0.00004319868,0.001568473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974845,0.001057474,0.0002464324,0.0008883475,0.00003330814,0.000005893824,0.0000316789,0.000001992171,0.000250387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07850844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07019933547807808,"score_gpt":0.2839986666618003,"score_spread":0.2137993311837222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}