{"id":"W1991343203","doi":"10.1007/s10654-011-9551-z","title":"Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"National Cancer Institute; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services","keywords":"Medicine; Checklist; Multidisciplinary approach; Transparency (behavior); Public health; Risk assessment; Epidemiology; Strengths and weaknesses; Quality (philosophy); Disease; Risk analysis (engineering); Data science; Management science; Pathology; Computer science; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4485348,0.0001132048,0.001913804,0.0002057454,0.00011668,0.00002345335,0.0004369545,0.00002162163,0.0001806671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4969204,0.00004366069,0.0004289764,0.0003008132,0.0001197948,0.0001481496,0.00006083872,0.0001936683,0.00002135671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009510783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001849387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003238835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003521317,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8614482,0.08518367,0.05145014,0.0004712397,0.001241726,0.0002050672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8957599,0.01086415,0.09052826,0.0008471826,0.001932421,0.0000680435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002302856,0.0000170491,0.8691756,0.00001844819,0.0005136978,0.00001754151,0.006526928,0.001122751,0.0001328451,0.0008144848,0.01483368,0.106804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000161239,0.0003201742,0.9719254,0.00007113825,0.0004146463,0.0002125207,0.004735707,0.004205786,0.00002908618,0.01001304,0.007851369,0.00005991261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8799679,0.007863832,0.1096008,0.0003251672,0.0004105429,0.0001194841,0.000003374163,0.000001525447,0.001707393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655117,0.001058916,0.03310008,0.00007156817,0.0001673028,7.47133e-7,5.305446e-7,0.000005231328,0.00008390696],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1067441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5678495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8764955356768007,"score_gpt":0.5367980619107815,"score_spread":0.3396974737660192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}