{"id":"W1991370512","doi":"10.4284/sej.2009.76.2.513","title":"Optimal Two‐Part Pricing in a Carbon Offset Market: A Comparison of Organizational Types","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern Economic Journal","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Offset (computer science); Counterintuitive; Microeconomics; Profit (economics); Industrial organization; Carbon offset; Constructive; Economics; Pricing strategies; Supply chain; Association (psychology); Business; Marketing; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007317687,0.0001667077,0.000574152,0.0003760957,0.00006229856,0.0000692813,0.0002483491,0.00009428844,0.001919101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005433808,0.0002041541,0.0001099392,0.0001061582,0.00004139956,0.000148167,0.00003540866,0.0002595481,0.0003363737],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000344152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000589882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002046533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000203877,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998168,0.00002035285,0.001192619,0.0002511112,0.00002252105,0.0003453925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988446,0.00004462165,0.0008139541,0.0001812939,0.00001948197,0.00009604176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001908297,0.0003114367,0.9339781,0.00002441244,0.0001329611,0.000007572252,0.01181688,0.0242339,0.00006245378,0.02682944,0.001050566,0.001361483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01528529,0.001087989,0.1436546,0.0004366859,0.00009246522,0.0005960157,0.01554263,0.5867941,0.0009095643,0.2104112,0.02195212,0.003237393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742357,0.000735811,0.00008722242,0.0006658958,0.0004515701,0.00009543772,0.0002199169,0.00001247684,0.02349602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984663,0.0001179792,0.0004109131,0.0001483427,0.0004658944,0.000001788659,0.00001325606,0.00002655848,0.0003489974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7903235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04478333316308271,"score_gpt":0.2604179434789398,"score_spread":0.2156346103158571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}