{"id":"W1991370512","doi":"10.4284/sej.2009.76.2.513","title":"Optimal Two‐Part Pricing in a Carbon Offset Market: A Comparison of Organizational Types","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern Economic Journal","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Offset (computer science); Counterintuitive; Microeconomics; Profit (economics); Industrial organization; Carbon offset; Constructive; Economics; Pricing strategies; Supply chain; Association (psychology); Business; Marketing; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004356531,0.0007525628,0.001535416,0.001023382,0.001706311,0.005745056,0.002601853,0.004250129,0.01227931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01099093,0.0007674902,0.001090506,0.0007719146,0.00304374,0.008155963,0.002987171,0.002186814,0.0007370822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002552567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002935993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001900642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001577712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964701,0.001762642,0.0001431729,0.0003579905,0.0004784784,0.00078768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924507,0.003843481,0.001018758,0.0007294024,0.0004749545,0.001482676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002046382,0.001830668,0.00957376,0.0002908781,0.0002015529,0.001006539,0.0006946716,0.323341,0.01301093,0.5863616,0.001710188,0.05993172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005302517,0.0009867249,0.005410015,0.00005820591,0.0001597268,0.0003129994,0.001755836,0.6741621,0.003798771,0.3100161,0.0026768,0.0001325048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7965001,0.0003089742,0.1596759,0.001640274,0.00006455016,0.0003790383,0.00008758425,0.0001127605,0.04123076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815152,0.0001378467,0.01515329,0.00006887838,0.00002475366,0.00009035967,0.00002105321,0.00001865442,0.002969987],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01227931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04107833,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04478333316308271,"score_gpt":0.2604179434789398,"score_spread":0.2156346103158571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}