{"id":"W1991391726","doi":"10.1023/a:1005693330921","title":"A preidentification questioning effect: Serendipitously increasing correct rejections.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Legal psychology; Witness; Eyewitness identification; Social psychology; Identification (biology); Test (biology); Cognitive psychology; Law; Computer science; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01125349,0.0005203129,0.0004074317,0.0006225778,0.000305051,0.0004272542,0.0004814073,0.001016383,0.004036929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06450428,0.0003219935,0.0002898409,0.0002373425,0.0007846779,0.0008963037,0.0008603599,0.001855052,0.0006198803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002014558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024919,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000232242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004915377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9891912,0.007055427,0.0005810672,0.0009546916,0.001974556,0.0002430482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7869684,0.1736732,0.02137508,0.01336306,0.002408163,0.002212177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02304241,0.01133335,0.3566348,0.001202178,0.0008172372,0.0008684375,0.004576237,0.0004982302,0.2975695,0.002435985,0.003937029,0.2970847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004132597,0.0135778,0.8889626,0.0001537562,0.000397399,0.002806147,0.00067097,0.001608722,0.08591615,0.00117514,0.004252568,0.00006540124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882962,0.0005693875,0.004714157,0.0003704911,0.0001253902,0.0001594107,0.000182192,0.0001183763,0.005464483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942309,0.0001914934,0.003769777,0.0005152546,0.00004052405,0.0000862469,0.00009886304,0.00003467135,0.001032352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01125349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05951488,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02324809556677742,"score_gpt":0.3438059769850161,"score_spread":0.3205578814182387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}