{"id":"W1991391726","doi":"10.1023/a:1005693330921","title":"A preidentification questioning effect: Serendipitously increasing correct rejections.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Legal psychology; Witness; Eyewitness identification; Social psychology; Identification (biology); Test (biology); Cognitive psychology; Law; Computer science; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003223159,0.0001455951,0.0001669804,0.0001351678,0.000537666,0.0000992546,0.00007556236,0.000156176,0.00305335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008011819,0.0001503822,0.00005915944,0.0001424044,0.0001878623,0.0001211142,0.00001973478,0.0002199455,0.0003850039],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003544674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004277995,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002102125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001323072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988005,0.0002416517,0.0002502581,0.0003840804,0.00009870114,0.0002248794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993934,0.00004389871,0.0001036442,0.0003157383,0.00004622979,0.00009711202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004533986,0.0007965964,0.5163129,0.00002046278,0.0001045783,0.0001773158,0.002801154,0.000001074155,0.02485881,0.2681154,0.008023618,0.1783347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001303544,0.0004566612,0.9482685,0.00002423516,0.0001477145,0.001809994,0.0003202935,0.00000176309,0.0002851833,0.0005062541,0.04660301,0.000272829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9324321,0.00006927217,0.0001502188,0.00004339815,0.002128649,0.0002862542,0.000003156579,0.0002728409,0.06461406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898297,0.000005775254,0.00004086866,0.0002207064,0.0002539034,0.000205917,0.00003317285,0.00002381888,0.009386108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4319556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02324809556677742,"score_gpt":0.3438059769850161,"score_spread":0.3205578814182387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}