{"id":"W1991400804","doi":"10.1017/s0004972711002279","title":"A NOTE ON NIELSEN EQUIVALENCE IN FINITELY GENERATED ABELIAN GROUPS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society","topic":"Advanced Topology and Set Theory","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Mathematics; Abelian group; Rank of an abelian group; Elementary abelian group; Non-abelian group; Combinatorics; G-module; Rank (graph theory); Free abelian group; Equivalence (formal languages); Automorphism; Graph; Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007886581,0.0002510953,0.0004072275,0.001458756,0.001384499,0.001414458,0.0005611174,0.0007797944,0.003994626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002652599,0.0002094457,0.0004636658,0.0008787196,0.00291258,0.002413366,0.001800065,0.00175426,0.000269114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008293442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003688805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001505028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001758348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989673,0.0002656975,0.00005089239,0.0001318413,0.0004338728,0.0001505212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980814,0.001350183,0.0001024904,0.0001241651,0.0001889045,0.0001528009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002555128,0.00002028553,0.0004463128,0.00002341335,0.000005618715,0.0001879853,0.0002927197,0.0005338978,0.0007669787,0.9915506,0.001252987,0.004893746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007447896,0.00003057224,0.0007175853,0.00001375108,0.000005059768,0.0001340821,0.00009182793,0.001624227,0.0006833447,0.9848422,0.01183995,0.00001005197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5054902,0.004684968,0.07819378,0.006243179,0.003864979,0.00006052349,0.0002763695,0.0002209942,0.400965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769256,0.000919404,0.008116445,0.0004287156,0.001323004,0.00002158245,0.0001143674,0.00002535901,0.01212552],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003994626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0133633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09031598133966928,"score_gpt":0.3183979921316468,"score_spread":0.2280820107919775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}