{"id":"W1991500684","doi":"10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00422.x","title":"A phylogenetic analysis of relationships among genera of Conopidae (Diptera) based on molecular and morphological data","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cladistics","topic":"Diptera species taxonomy and behavior","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Subfamily; Monophyly; Maximum parsimony; Phylogenetic tree; Clade; Synapomorphy; Zoology; Evolutionary biology; Ribosomal DNA; Genetics; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003708563,0.0002510259,0.0002162156,0.002295261,0.0007646573,0.0003342901,0.0001414969,0.0001499633,0.00121127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007522191,0.0001201377,0.0001978349,0.001232869,0.0003168768,0.0003244594,0.0003861304,0.0003173796,0.0003665457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001704426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002230056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000567548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001226928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998543,0.00004682228,0.00001587833,0.00003373341,0.00003123263,0.00001805253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994228,0.0002188685,0.0001439213,0.00005839078,0.00007233082,0.00008378678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006262875,0.0002168959,0.5326061,0.0007278191,0.0002088749,0.0008654613,0.002138325,0.001426875,0.1982621,0.0007292656,0.0007229966,0.261469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001499433,0.0004388216,0.9854858,0.0001269154,0.00008570396,0.001824782,0.001042745,0.003027006,0.002485814,0.0004890328,0.004955577,0.00002271611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941106,0.001093328,0.002224279,0.00004346527,0.000004185141,0.00006227585,0.0004866816,0.00002045495,0.00195463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980399,0.001297834,0.01572949,0.00002738003,0.000006800995,0.00006669766,0.001968722,0.000008127183,0.000496039],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002295261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004052043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1005793867911566,"score_gpt":0.2546318499100366,"score_spread":0.15405246311888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}