{"id":"W1991541520","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.01.023","title":"An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Production Economics","topic":"Supply Chain and Inventory Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":207,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Imperfect; Commit; Computer science; Economic order quantity; Quality (philosophy); Order (exchange); Process (computing); Production (economics); Reliability engineering; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Economics; Microeconomics; Business; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009194977,0.0001069431,0.000148694,0.0003027167,0.00009656241,0.000292499,0.0002052825,0.00003931202,0.00008037233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001025434,0.00009741825,0.0000535758,0.00003957777,0.00006756076,0.002397954,0.00003104556,0.000135766,0.00001101353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009161309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000410316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002267235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001171825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991994,0.000007876056,0.0004045574,0.0002075069,0.00008233693,0.00009832078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988002,0.00001653897,0.0006399985,0.0001280565,0.0003969461,0.00001827047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003272225,0.000981978,0.4992176,0.000214499,0.00123327,0.000006564283,0.00048656,0.03202095,0.01427088,0.3888039,0.01209147,0.04740014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006919695,0.0005412305,0.2685725,0.00007411107,0.0002658244,0.0003057975,0.002710217,0.06182469,0.004639044,0.02678037,0.6260833,0.001283248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876252,0.000007953656,0.001113947,0.003596318,0.007005334,0.0001675011,0.00000393205,0.00002652737,0.0004532629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924959,0.00003178107,0.001050334,0.0004177972,0.0059026,0.000007111805,0.0000157241,0.00001734544,0.00006141732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6139918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3972601,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02703451348885006,"score_gpt":0.2895766040217116,"score_spread":0.2625420905328616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}