{"id":"W1991557933","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2011.06.012","title":"Pushing the boundaries of conventional forest policy research: Analyzing institutional change at multiple levels","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Institutionalism; Order (exchange); Common-pool resource; Collective action; Action (physics); New institutionalism; Climate change; Economic system; Political science; Environmental resource management; Economics; Ecology; Microeconomics; Politics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006611977,0.0001499456,0.000161211,0.0002370911,0.001055621,0.0001096903,0.0003722556,0.00007623192,0.000618154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002158174,0.0001243105,0.00008416807,0.0002791696,0.002318073,0.0005880971,0.0008182685,0.000146629,0.000293535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003052426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009903221,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04141951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04300642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987716,0.00005483807,0.0002988107,0.0002546011,0.0001377259,0.0004824231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993255,0.0001253464,0.0001353102,0.0002749169,0.00001349268,0.0001254764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005004616,0.00003529162,0.486392,0.00001909786,0.00003065912,0.000001069107,0.002298797,0.0004509974,0.000007929264,0.5082786,0.001607318,0.0008282186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005218917,0.0000661076,0.7426946,0.00001588042,0.00001084686,0.00001078427,0.00005312671,0.004123953,0.0000525407,0.04594431,0.2063383,0.0001676357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634831,0.00004856693,0.00002593407,0.001828459,0.00009561866,0.0002789402,0.00009799348,0.00001552329,0.03412589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968947,0.0001294698,0.0001855639,0.0004365536,0.0005469495,0.00004367418,0.00002864754,0.00001484101,0.001719629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4623343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9744563,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1865684073223408,"score_gpt":0.3080932757592276,"score_spread":0.1215248684368869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}