{"id":"W1991573661","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.001","title":"An evaluation of the functional significance of peat microorganisms using a reciprocal transplant approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Soil Biology and Biochemistry","topic":"Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Peat; Microbial population biology; Species richness; Biology; Nutrient; Microorganism; Composition (language); Ecology; Respiration; Incubation; Botany; Bacteria; Biochemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007939186,0.0007207126,0.0005889289,0.0003867692,0.0004640852,0.0005152944,0.0005564539,0.0007009652,0.001066757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007203683,0.0001829579,0.0004201837,0.0002502619,0.0004539175,0.0005538265,0.0005741929,0.000816209,0.0001862107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000352489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003744487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007276987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008352502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994158,0.0001389135,0.00003880334,0.0001695335,0.0001329233,0.0001040075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992257,0.0002784819,0.0001039466,0.000116546,0.0001088126,0.0001664673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004028651,0.000120938,0.0003717631,0.00002015036,0.00000715482,0.00001826922,0.00001892252,0.0000605616,0.99751,0.00007922924,0.0000035863,0.001386599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006340259,0.004483526,0.0147311,0.0000070988,0.0001243168,0.0002107579,0.0001300784,0.002315748,0.9771792,0.000210392,0.0005236699,0.00002077814],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971164,0.0001732713,0.002058009,0.00002142055,0.00001686116,0.00003808843,0.00006986638,0.00001821187,0.000487716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957645,0.0001928867,0.002696169,0.0000279634,0.00001246023,0.00006356696,0.0001456994,0.00001337666,0.001083338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001066757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00419867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02365713553559226,"score_gpt":0.2534643318025869,"score_spread":0.2298071962669947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}