{"id":"W1991574598","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.08.015","title":"Modeling species invasions in Ecopath with Ecosim: An evaluation using Laurentian Great Lakes models","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Modelling","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; University of British Columbia; Great Lakes Fishery Commission","keywords":"Invasive species; Biomass (ecology); Ecosystem; Environmental science; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Introduced species; Fishery; Ecosystem model; Fisheries management; Geography; Biology; Fishing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003152848,0.001365923,0.000817445,0.0006766788,0.0008003302,0.0009135982,0.002088135,0.001460967,0.001302002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008555264,0.0007737144,0.0008618294,0.000564995,0.0007605967,0.001538225,0.0009920903,0.001035183,0.0001175236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001845444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002082187,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1084016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993203,0.0004660934,0.00002914276,0.0000660674,0.00005880849,0.00005954786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893237,0.009245316,0.0003267731,0.0003019141,0.0004671413,0.0003351975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002862611,0.0001460303,0.007432401,0.00004324807,0.0001061762,0.00004498193,0.00009074547,0.9869944,0.0001856334,0.0005302647,0.000349539,0.003790307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003447621,0.00006531869,0.0006665772,0.000003816462,0.00002239829,0.000006664182,0.00002224167,0.9988391,0.0001342939,0.0001305647,0.00006933405,0.000005197902],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936759,0.0001308985,0.004357591,0.0002443173,0.00002141682,0.00003222183,0.0002319987,0.0002659909,0.001039669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895803,0.0001129334,0.009122237,0.00006414987,0.00001363829,0.00006595716,0.0002465057,0.0001060207,0.0006881962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8915984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2155413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1564543849426573,"score_gpt":0.2676819696080808,"score_spread":0.1112275846654235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}