{"id":"W1991722090","doi":"10.1139/f07-073","title":"Estimating abundance of pelagic fishes using gillnet catch data in data-limited fisheries: a Bayesian approach","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation","keywords":"Pelagic zone; Abundance (ecology); Fishery; Biomass (ecology); Environmental science; Fisheries management; Sampling (signal processing); Population; Marine ecosystem; Geography; Ecosystem; Ecology; Fishing; Biology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00953442,0.001048922,0.001339576,0.002765438,0.0008719874,0.001952158,0.002467335,0.001490814,0.001046317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04018846,0.001696247,0.001554955,0.001885919,0.0009459295,0.003493582,0.001927473,0.001360118,0.000399538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001419239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001651044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01605518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02185579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971746,0.001468745,0.0003026543,0.0004387785,0.0005152198,0.00009996671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836785,0.01241876,0.001788748,0.0009203763,0.0009679887,0.0002255686],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002462431,0.0002168536,0.06689552,0.0005469822,0.0006110942,0.000310594,0.0006409851,0.7417461,0.002678492,0.02636535,0.001355604,0.1583862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004319723,0.00005280233,0.005994352,0.0001182446,0.00009324517,0.0001499355,0.00005722632,0.9514207,0.0005674098,0.0402234,0.001211031,0.00006839493],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02766706,0.0003002749,0.9707874,0.0001895275,0.000008946497,0.00006876267,0.0002668516,0.0001718502,0.0005392787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4684862,0.0008359655,0.5271618,0.0002197014,0.00007386434,0.0007424614,0.001412911,0.00008405089,0.0009830252],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01605518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05042344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07837835071285976,"score_gpt":0.2911876386900343,"score_spread":0.2128092879771746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}