{"id":"W1991820714","doi":"10.1016/j.epsl.2009.03.023","title":"Sulfide and whole rock Re–Os systematics of eclogite and pyroxenite xenoliths from the Slave Craton, Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Earth and Planetary Science Letters","topic":"Geological and Geochemical Analysis","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Macquarie University; University of Alberta","keywords":"Eclogite; Xenolith; Geology; Geochemistry; Kimberlite; Craton; Radiogenic nuclide; Petrography; Mantle (geology); Subduction; Paleontology; Tectonics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003145777,0.0001565316,0.0002644592,0.00004342178,0.000299544,0.00009755292,0.0002383751,0.00003761226,0.0003010082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008803549,0.00008972384,0.00002198661,0.0002855371,0.0003734814,0.0001798829,0.000021367,0.0001501948,0.00000783926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001399084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004780606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2796107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3251443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998606,0.00006494593,0.0002571392,0.000348486,0.0003821751,0.0003412074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990247,0.0004272478,0.0001018201,0.000185003,0.00002319566,0.0002380211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002512923,0.000004052108,0.9896705,0.00002239675,0.00001870378,0.00003602684,0.0002266569,0.00162715,0.002494962,0.000009991787,0.0008389432,0.005025555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001306528,0.00007928522,0.9844203,0.00002847847,0.00003150895,0.00002202197,0.0001933448,0.01322449,0.0002992413,0.0006666351,0.0007583483,0.0001456772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882803,0.001848488,0.00002047658,0.00909568,0.00005215059,0.0001097982,0.0002380241,0.000009333568,0.000345736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993129,0.00008635842,0.0003400042,0.006274576,0.00004814702,1.786602e-7,0.00009670272,7.542592e-7,0.00002433129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04553356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7251864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00614556133074156,"score_gpt":0.153925026452696,"score_spread":0.1477794651219544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}