{"id":"W1991883039","doi":"10.1117/12.2004531","title":"Correction of autofluorescence intensity for epithelial scattering by optical coherence tomography: a phantom study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE","topic":"Optical Coherence Tomography Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"BC Cancer Agency","funders":"","keywords":"Optical coherence tomography; Imaging phantom; Scattering; Optics; Autofluorescence; Light scattering; Materials science; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Optical tomography; Physics; Biomedical engineering; Medicine; Fluorescence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001805901,0.000825584,0.0003963224,0.0005515056,0.000268577,0.0004863147,0.0005802012,0.0007971036,0.0009317309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003964619,0.0003267889,0.0003914426,0.0004077054,0.0003255891,0.0006789067,0.000336098,0.0004297239,0.0002194663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003957985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006049922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001548717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00116207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994673,0.0002687513,0.00002733079,0.00007841153,0.0001238275,0.00003442208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973823,0.001656822,0.0003221302,0.0003001926,0.0002594499,0.00007906528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006487647,0.0003933664,0.004129095,0.0002593803,0.00006543829,0.0008140336,0.0001773353,0.02849579,0.9474642,0.001780066,0.0004578625,0.01531478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001296923,0.00247401,0.006764814,0.00007216055,0.0002180881,0.003950668,0.0001343426,0.1883522,0.7863808,0.0008290613,0.01059522,0.00009902698],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6021752,0.003871505,0.3891744,0.0006134838,0.0001454108,0.0004575539,0.000398786,0.0008539398,0.002309691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8433338,0.002114717,0.1504761,0.0002938348,0.00003960134,0.0004507942,0.000345902,0.0002096144,0.002735522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001805901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009550631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01023128732710556,"score_gpt":0.2264648324243388,"score_spread":0.2162335450972332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}