{"id":"W1991917344","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2010.10736025","title":"Assessing the collective wealth of Australian research libraries: measuring overlap using <i>WorldCat Collection Analysis</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","funders":"State Library of New South Wales","keywords":"Software; Data collection; Order (exchange); Computer science; Library science; Bibliographic database; World Wide Web; Research data; Database; Business; Sociology; Subject (documents)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002103702,0.0002824052,0.0004047404,0.001163864,0.00299913,0.006903146,0.002678431,0.000146933,0.0003920716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001561848,0.0001737694,0.000333955,0.01014812,0.0005196613,0.01287181,0.000603586,0.001908435,0.00001612011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009504394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002250544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003855626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009189102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957876,0.0009273181,0.0007935164,0.0004245625,0.001284766,0.0007823049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972804,0.00085939,0.0005706329,0.0007647797,0.0002036084,0.0003211823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007274018,0.0007008504,0.4600154,0.0001475272,0.004624275,0.0002024944,0.02904022,0.008143554,0.01830522,0.06797331,0.4002334,0.009886343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002889938,0.0008163429,0.4843864,0.0004303961,0.0006055681,0.001961606,0.01311297,0.01870346,0.1708873,0.1329445,0.1713365,0.00192495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9428156,0.00009606523,0.003316218,0.0243216,0.001481416,0.0006170236,0.000007166924,0.0002149918,0.02712994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481099,0.0000235837,0.01337505,0.0002301915,0.0005025274,0.000009640684,0.000002973162,0.0000313508,0.03771481],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2288969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1192533248206169,"score_gpt":0.3409480649430464,"score_spread":0.2216947401224295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}