{"id":"W1992245020","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00221.x","title":"Political trust and the vote in multiparty elections: The Canadian case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Distrust; Politics; Voting; Multinomial logistic regression; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Political science; Voting behavior; Turnout; Political economy; Presidential system; Survey data collection; Voter turnout; Affect (linguistics); Single non-transferable vote; Economics; Sociology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00211719,0.0003046592,0.0007021517,0.001953839,0.01225343,0.003806571,0.001581502,0.00167843,0.007642398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009521088,0.0002112382,0.0005819974,0.004139097,0.00302006,0.0008010872,0.002164342,0.002501751,0.0003680903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04072209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02908392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9852246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995683,0.0005846274,0.00008101593,0.0001925634,0.0007986407,0.002660119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931754,0.001909673,0.001038653,0.0003637639,0.001366939,0.002145456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007270105,0.0008250083,0.7290321,0.0001361953,0.0001434987,0.007758974,0.02507199,0.005458766,0.0006990575,0.1617353,0.0139826,0.05442952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003502623,0.0002632548,0.8166946,0.0002817423,0.0002666096,0.002144038,0.08102039,0.02385091,0.0007340639,0.01960929,0.0545023,0.0002824681],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.959176,0.0004043807,0.0002323016,0.003313126,0.00002541456,0.00004339123,0.0003815436,0.000007429604,0.03641653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975394,0.0001340125,0.00007064524,0.00006661954,0.00000808101,0.000007716576,0.00006315314,0.000001681861,0.002108756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04072209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2954609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1588428702456235,"score_gpt":0.4580661936646287,"score_spread":0.2992233234190051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}